Saturday, June 16, 2007

Salve Magister!

For some reason, I took first-year Latin in high school. My parents thought it'd be useful later in life, and I unfortunately obliged.

Anyway, though I remember hardly any of the Latin learned in the class (Salve Magister=Hello Teacher), I do remember the first three minutes of every day.

Every one, including the teacher, would simply sit and meditate. With our elbows on desks and our hands over our faces, we would individually reflect on our lives. I think it was called "three quiet minutes."

Most kids loved it. It meant a solid three minutes when we were not reciting Latin poetry or diagriming sentences. It was essentially a three minute nap time, and who doesn't like nap time?

However, it turns out that my Latin teacher may have been on to something. An article in today's New York Times describes how "mindfulness training" is being tried out at a number of schools across the country. It's essentially a glorified version of my three-quiet minutes from Latin class.

In attempt to allow students to become more in touch with their emotions and to destress, schools are adapting techiques from Buddihst mediation, such as listening to the sound of a Tibetan bowl.

I realize that this post might not seem too relevant to anything, but I thought it was funny to see how my Latin teacher's technique has gone mainstream. I hope that he's getting some sort of royalties.

Friday, June 15, 2007

The Vegan Dessert Question of the Week!

No Vegan Dessert is complete without a full glass of milk. I personally go with the skim, others 2%, a brave few whole.

Yet, what's up with the 98% jump from 2% to whole? Can someone please explain this in the comments section. What the heck do the percentages mean?

If you provide an ample explanation, I will award you with a nice, firm handshake along with a glass of 0% milk. Cyber-handshakes will not be awarded this time around.

Thanks.

Glibert Arenas: Bike Safety Instructor

Wizard's star player Gilbert Arenas has one of the funniest blogs on the internet. If you haven't checked it out yet, you really should.

About once every week, Arenas bursts out 4-5 posts of hilarity.

This week, Arenas decided to bring out the mature, parent side of his personality. Gilbert was biking in D.C. and he fell. Here's what he had to say about the learning experience:

"I wasn’t wearing a bike helmet. The only people who wear bike helmets are 13-year old girls and Tony Hawk, but that’s skateboarding and he’s doing flips and stuff. I’m going straight."

For more on his upcoming book, vacation plans, and possible reality show, click here.

That Felt Really Good: Mets Take Game One

How do you beat one of the greatest pitchers of all time?

Bunt, steal, defend, and pitch even better than him.

The Mets needed a win in the worst way, and they got it. Hopefully this will start streaks of different kinds for both the Yankees and Mets.

Here are some thoughts on tonight's game:

-It is great to watch Oliver Perez pitch. I love his playful, relaxed style; how he tosses the ball up between pitches and skips over the baseline at the end of innings. When it comes to pitching, the guy seems to have split personalities. For one inning, he can't find the plate, and then the next one, he's masterful. Ollie pitched this game on a tight rope, and he did not fall.

-With due time, I think Carlos Gomez is going to be my favorite player. I love how he bunted for a single in his first at-bat ever the intimidating, old Clemens. And what a great catch in the outfield with two men on; if he missed the catch, I doubt the Mets would have won.

-How does Jose Reyes remember all those handshakes? He has one with Wright, Delgado, Franco...The man is amazing. Best player in the league, best handshaker in the World. Though I have to admit that it does get a little old seeing handshake after handshake in the dugout.

-In tonight's game Roger Clemens passed Randy Johnson for the 2nd most strikeouts in Major League History. It is an unbelievable coincidence that with more than 4000 strikeouts apiece, they are both active, and separated by just a few ks. Every time one passes the other, the game should stop and a standing ovation should ensue-as a fan, I thoroughly enjoy participating in standing O's.

-The Mets have got speed, some coming from surprising places. We all knew about Reyes and Gomez, but Wright? He now has 15 steals on the season, and has yet to get caught. Where did this speed come from? But then in the eighth inning Julio Franco tried to steal a base. Apparently he thought speed was contagious. Come on Julio-raw oatmeal can only do so much for you.

Well that was a fun game to watch; hopefully it will lead to greener pastures for the Mets and browner(?) pastures for the Yankees.

New York's State of Mind: Subway Series Version 2.0

What a difference a month can make.

On May 18, the New York Yankees came to Shea Stadium desperate. They were hurting in the body, in the standings, and in the tabloids.

The Mets were flying sky high. They had a comfortable lead in the NL East. Their allegedly old, shaky pitching rotation was dominating. Everything seemed bright for the fans at shea.

Now, the Mets are strugling like its 2004, and the Yankees seem to be back. The Mets have lost five in-a-row, the Yankees have won nine in-a-row.

Last year's Mets team gave off such an unbelievable vibe. There was never a time I thought they were going to lose. Even during tough times, I had no doubt they'd come back and win. It hurt so much when they lost because, for me at least, they weren't supposed to lose.

This year's team does not have that vibe. I don't trust them like I did last year's team. I don't put nearly as much hope in them.

Hopefully, by the end of the season, that trust will come back.

I was planning on writing much more and better, but the game has started, and I have to watch.

Enjoy the Series, and Lets Go Mets!


(Is that Julio Franco I see starting?!)

Thursday, June 14, 2007

Farewell Toucan Sam, It Was Nice Knowing You

I feel bad for the youth of America.

A few weeks ago, I read an article in the "Dining Out" section of The New York Times denouncing the beloved kid's menu. It described how some restaurants are replacing the chicken-finger and fries filled menu with healthier "adult" alternatives.

"In short, I came to the realization that America is in the grips of a nefarious chicken-finger pandemic, in which a blandly tasty foodstuff has somehow become the de facto official nibble of our young," David Kamp describes in the article, "Don't Point That Menu at My Child, Please."

Now today, I read another article in the NYT describing how The Kellogg Company is going to phase out advertising towards children 12 and younger for products that don't meet certain nutritional requirements. Included in the list of "unhealthy" products includes Fruit-Loops, Apple Jacks, and Pop-Tarts.

I long for the days when I woke up to a bowl of fruit loops, and chomped on my chicken fingers and fries for dinner. Even now, I am trying to get my dinning hall to supply Fruit Loops.

Kid's menus were awesome. I got crayons and mazes to go along with my fantastic fried food. While adults had to laboriously cut through steak or split cookies in half, I could gorge my self with ketchup, curly fries, and fat.

I don't have a full picture of myself on this website, but I'll tell you now that I am not obese. This is for two reasons:
1) I didn't eat this unhealthy food everyday, every meal; my mom wouldn't let me.
2) I played sports, not video games.

Eating Fruit Loops and curly fries was an exceptional part of my childhood, and future generations should be able to experience the same gastric experience. Unhealthy foods shouldn't be eliminated; kids and parents should just learn how to live properly with them. Let's not take the fun out of eating.

Since I now I have such a large 12 and younger audience, here is my own, personal advertisement for Kellogg Products:

Eat Fruit Loops!
Eat Pop Tarts!
Stay Away from Apple Jacks (they're not that good).
And play P-Wee football, rec basketball, or Little League.
Not only will you stay in shape, but you might meet Harold Reynolds!

Noodle Wars: Let's Start Planning Now

Thanks to deadspin, by way of awfulannouncing, we have this most excellent video.

I didn't see the movie 300, but if it is half as entertaining as this clip of UC Davis students battling it out with swimming noodles, then I think I should probably go and rent it.

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Vin Scully Quote of the Day

Tonight, during the Mets v. Dodgers Broadcast:

“They are killing a lot of worms, they have not yet hit a ball to the outfield.”

YouTube Takes over Democratic Debate

YouTube is great.

It's a conversation starter, an outlet for bored people across the World who don't want to blog, a democratic movie production studio.

Yet, has its reach extended too far, too fast?

An article on The New York Times website this afternoon described how YouTube will be integrated into the July 23 democratic presidential debate in South Carolina. "New Presidential Debate Site? Clearly YouTube," said that the debate, which will be broadcasted on CNN with Anderson Cooper at the helm, will allow viewers to ask questions via YouTube.

Author of the article Katherine Q. Seelye writes:
Now imagine a kid in jeans and a T-shirt asking a question, less reverentially, more pointedly and using powerful visual images to underscore the point. Maybe he or she will ask about the war in Iraq — and show clips from a soldier’s funeral. Or a mushroom cloud. If global warming is the issue, the videographer might photoshop himself or herself onto a melting glacier. The question might come in the form of a rap song or through spliced images of a candidate’s contradictory statements.
When I first glanced at the article, I probably had the same reaction as many--I have a chance to ask a question at a presidential debate! Where can I get video equipment!

Yet, when I thought about it more, I realized that I'm not thrilled at all with the YouTube takeover. I think it is a bad idea. This is a presidential debate we're talking about, and it is being turned into American Idol.

Ever since I was little, I've loved watching presidential debates. When I was young, it was to laugh at the goofy ears of Ross Perot. Now that I'm old enough to vote, the debates are a prime outlet for me to zero in on the candidates. Even though so much is rehearsed, over the course of a two hour debate, much can be drawn out of the candidates.

The best part about these debates is that all attention is put on the candidates. There are no intermediates to interpret what is being said--I can tune into CNN later for that if I want. While the debate is ongoing, I have to draw all conclusions on my own without any analysts help. I get to have a dialogue with the candidates, and no one can interfere with it. The information is coming straight from the candidates mouth into my TV room.

The YouTubing of the debate is inappropriately shifting the focus from the debaters to the viewers. I'll no longer be able to have an unbiased conversation with the candidates; I'll have to watch some graphic-filled video with a clear slant to it.

While watching debates, I often think debate moderators can do a better job of phrasing questions and giving all the candidates a fair say. However, I suspect that I will be yearning for the moderators of yesteryear when watching the YouTubed debate.

I suppose the only positive to come out of this is that more people will watch. Many people who would have otherwise watched American Inventor or America's Got Talent, will watch the debate. Essentially, the debate is being turned into the shows they love to watch--the viewer is getting an equal part to the performers. This YouTube debate will certainly be more exciting than those of the past.

However, when it comes to presidential debates, the barrier between viewer and performer should stay. Debates aren't supposed to be all that exciting. Let the YouTube videos remain on-line, where people have to search to find them, and don't force them upon viewers of a national debate.

The viewers have always had a chance to play a part in the election process--it comes on Election Day.

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Vin Scully is the Real Deal

Much has been said about Vin Scully, the Dodger Broadcaster since 1950. Though I have heard so much praise directed towards him, before yesterday, I had never heard him broadcast a game at length. Yes, I have heard some of his famous calls, but never a routine, regular season game.

Thanks to MLB TV, I have listened to Vin Scully for the past two days, and the guy is legit.

The Dodgers are playing the Mets in a three-game series and MLB TV is only feeding me the LA broadcast. I suppose I am grateful for this, otherwise I wouldn't have been able to hear the living legend.

Vin Scully is a one-man broadcast team. He has no color commentator. He has no reporter roaming the stands.

The man has so much knowledge, not to mention a made-for-TV voice. Here are some highlights from the past two nights:

-Scully told a story of how Carlos Beltran once bought a monkey. When Carlos heard that Monkeys could live for over 40 years, however, he promptly returned it.

-He called a triple a "bellywhopper"

-He explained how the big wave of Cuban defections to play baseball in the states only came after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Before then, conditions for baseball players in Cuba were so favorable they had no reason to leave. I didn't know this.

The best aspect of Scully is that at a time when there are so many talking heads on TV who don't back up there statements (see Morgan, Joe), Scully uses a wealth of statistics to analyze the teams and players. Whether analyzing the Mets woes at home, or a batters woes at the plate, Scully does a great job of balancing stats and commentary.

He knows so freaking much, both about history as well as the current league, and I learned a ton from the few innings I listened to him. If you ever can watch a Dodgers game on TV, I highly recommend it, regardless of who they're playing.

Now, if only the Mets would start playing some good ball.

Random YouTube Video of the Day: Human Tetris

Ravi, a commenter on Metsblog.com, provided a link to this hilarious video. After viewing this clip, the calculator version of tetris you played in math class will seem a kind of lame.

NBA Finals Game 3: Pre-Live Blog

I have no desire to watch game 3 of the NBA Finals tonight. However, I thought I should do a post on it away. Here is what my live-blog probably would look life if I actually watch the game*:

-Pick and Roll with Lebron James

-Is anyone guarding Tony Parker?

-Flop

-Tim Duncan is freaking good; he dominates on both sides of the court.

-Pick and Roll with Lebron James

-Shut up Stuart Scott!

-Jeff van Gundy is a great broadcast, if only he'd cheer up a bit.

-Pick and Roll with Lebron James.

-"Drew, I think I missed a spot,"
-your favorite barber, Carlos.

-I heard Tony Parker's getting married. If anyone knows when, and to whom, please let me know.

-That was a great Vitamin Water commercial with 50 Cent.

-Geeze, this game is not going so well for the Cavs, I wonder what kind of ratings this is going to pull in.

-I miss the days of NBA on NBC.

-Flop

-Let's see what else is on TV...

*If anyone actually wants to live-blog, please fell free to do so in the comments section.

The Jinx is in Full Effect




























Above is this week's cover of Sports Illustrated.

Below is the Mets' record for the past eight games:

2-8.

Ouch.

At least this cover debunked the El Duque age controvery.
There is no way that guy is in his 40s. He is clearly 12; check out his smile.

(Thanks to Metsblog.com for first alerting me about the cover)

Monday, June 11, 2007

Is Big Shot Rob a Hall of Famer?

No.

In Bill Simmons recent Sports Guy Chat on ESPN.com, he was asked this question, and emphatically said yes.

“It would be unfortunate if he wasn’t able to be a Hall of Famer,” Damon Jones of the Caveliers said in a recent New York Times Article.

Robert Horry has hit some ridiculous shots, he has been on some ridiculous teams, but he does not deserve to be in the Hall.

The argument goes that Horry will soon win his seventh NBA championship and thus deserves to be inducted into Springfield. This despite the fact that his career averages are: 7.2 points, 4.9 rebounds and 2.2 assists per game.

Yes, Horry did hit one of the greatest shots ever against the Kings in 2004(?), when the ball was tipped right to him at the top of the key and he nailed the three. Yes, he has hit playoff game-winners time and again.

Yet, Horry has NEVER carried a team. He can't. He's not that good. He has simply been fortunate to be on great teams, and then to hit big shots when the superstars didn't.

He's kind of like Charlie from Mighty Ducks I. The kid is not that good; he is not nearly the best player on the team. Yet, at the end of the day, he's the one who does the Triple-Deak and wins the game. After the movie, everyone thinks that Charlie is the star. But if they just step back and think about it, they'll realize that he is not that great. He just excelled when it counted.

I hate to disagree with Bill Simmons, because he knows so freaking much about the NBA, but Robert Horry does not deserve to be in the Hall.

I doubt Horry will mind much, what with his seven Champships. Horry is not a Hall of Famer; he is a winner.

Welcome Back Harold!

Over at Deadspin.com, I just read one of the most uplifting sports stories of the year: former ESPN baseball analyst Harold Reynolds has been hired to work for MLB.com.

Little by little, what with the internet, Stuart Scott, and now this, I am having fewer and fewer reasons to watch ESPN. It is great.

Now, all that has to happen is for Major League Baseball to buy Little League. They can turn it into 1/2A ball. That way Harold can do what he was made for: broadcasting 12 year olds playing baseball.

Here is Deadspin's article: "Harold Reynolds is Back, Baby!"

I am a little confused as to how Harold is going to do a broadcast on MLB.com, but nonetheless, I am very happy.

Sunday, June 10, 2007

Random YouTube Video of the Week: Spelling Time!

I was never a big fan of spelling bees.

I'll never forget at sleep-away camp, for color war, I was selected to participate in a Spelling Bee. This was an all-sports camp, but for some reason, the director of the camp decided to have a Spelling Bee in his office each year.

I mispelled balloon. I thought there was only one l.

From that day forward, everytime I saw the camp director, I imagined that he looked down on me because of my inability to spell that one word.

Anyway, here is a great clip from from a past National Spelling Bee:

The End of an Era (Or So I Have Heard)

As a blogger, it seems like I am obligated to make a post about the Sopranos today, so here it goes:

I have never watched the show, since I don't get HBO.

Unlike most, I am relieved that the show is over. This way Sports Radio will stick to talking about sports, and not some show I don't even get on my home TV

Here's a post from Deadspin for anyone who actually watches the show: "Saying Goodbye to Our Favorite Hour of Every Week." This kindof made me wish I did watch it.


In other news, I started the HBO mini-series Band of Brothers on DVD last night. I will provide a review once I am done with it.

The Canals

Right now, the problem/brilliance of this blog (I'm not sure which one yet) is that we lack any focus. We simply say what is on our mind.

To check out a blog with a more specific purpose, check out The Canals, by my friend Danny from UPenn.

It's about music.

That's all I can say about it, as I haven't heard of a single musician mentioned on the blog. Maybe you have, and will enjoy what Danny has to say.

The site is filled with wit, as Danny was the second wittiest kid at my high school.

Graduation Speeches Hit the Press

Every year, around this time, I enjoy reading excerpts from college graduation speeches. I like to see what politicians, comedians, journalists, and athletes have to say about the World, and how their views differ.

Today was the day when The New York Times brought out the speech excerpts, and to my surprise, the President of our very own Amherst College was quoted in the article.

The issue of Iraq and United States foreign policy pervaded this year's graduation speeches, with Amherst President Tony Marx's speech a chief example.

Here is an excerpt from the article, written by Alan Finder:

Some speakers offered a critical view of the war and its consequences. Anthony W. Marx, the president of Amherst College, spoke at Amherst’s commencement of the lessons of the Roman empire, which he said declined when leaders turned away from civic action toward private pursuits, abdicating civil authority to the military.

“Always, our political reach, our cultural persuasion, our economic integration and our military might are bounded,” Dr. Marx said, drawing analogies between Rome’s decline and the present. “At those boundaries, smugness is challenged. If we fail to heed that challenge, if we do not learn from the limits of our victories, we risk the fate of Rome.”

Here's a link to the entire article: "Iraq is Backdrop for Many Graduation Speakers."
Also, to view a video of Marx's speech click here.

Finally, I wanted to share my favorite quote from this year's batch of graduation speeches. I read it in the June 4 issue of Sports Illustrated. It was recited by Ravens Head Coach Brian Billick at Johns Hopkins University:
In a Bacon-and-egg breakfast the chicken is involved, but the pig is committed. Be that pig.

Better Luck Next Year

6-3, 4-6, 6-3, 6-4. Nadal Wins.

Rafa simply wore down Roger in a repeat of last year's outcome. The last two sets weren't nearly as competetive as the first two. Federer made a slew of unforced errors, particularly when returning Nadal's spinning serves.

This is Nadal's third consecutive French Open win; amazingly, he has never lost a match at the French.

Federer will have to wait another year for the elusive Grand Slam, and it is likely that he will have to go through Nadal to get there. Until then, Federer's stats will continue to have one, glaring blip.

Other Thoughts:

The NBC tennis broadcast team is the best on TV for any major sporting event. They provide unique insight and talk just the right amount.

I would love to see an American man face Federer or Nadal on clay. It'd be like seeing the Mets face Kings Highway Elementary School in baseball.

I really wanted Federer to win this time. I thought he would. He seemed due for a victory. If he ever does win a French Open, I hope he has to beat Nadal to get there.